A co-pilot that creates cargo. So we moved upstream.

Red Cell · Sparrow Healthcare · Voice + RAG · 2024

Password

Full case study

Field research, the pivot from co-pilot to Lorena, interaction and voice architecture, human-in-the-loop escalation model, and technical architecture. Four sections cover the full incubation arc.

ROLEProduct Direction + Design
SCOPEHealthcare incubation · 0 → MVP
CONTEXTCHW workflow · Field validation before build
YEARS2024

The first direction was an AI co-pilot for Community Health Workers. It would have been another surface in an already fragmented workflow. At validation stage the risk was familiar: launch, low adoption, blame change management, never surface that the wedge was wrong.

Field contact with CHWs, ACPs, and PCPs ran before significant build, not to defend the concept but to locate where time, trust, and context were actually lost.

Outcomes.

Direction changed pre-build

Co-pilot abandoned; Lorena scoped upstream to voice outreach and structured handoffs before human follow-up.

Burden removal wedge

Workflow-first voice + RAG tied to the shifts CHWs actually work.

Reusable infrastructure

Patterns carried across healthcare incubations at Red Cell.

What the full case covers

  • Field research process and findings that changed the roadmap
  • Interaction and voice architecture for Lorena
  • Human-in-the-loop escalation and accountability model
  • Technical architecture and incubation reuse