A co-pilot that creates cargo — until we moved upstream.

Red Cell · Sparrow Healthcare · Voice + RAG · 2024

Password

Full case study

Field research, the pivot from co-pilot to Lorena, interaction and voice architecture, human-in-the-loop escalation model, and technical architecture — four sections covering the full incubation arc.

ROLEProduct Direction + Design
SCOPEHealthcare incubation · 0 → MVP
CONTEXTCHW workflow · Field validation before build
YEARS2024

The first direction was an AI co-pilot for Community Health Workers — another surface in an already fragmented workflow. At validation stage the risk was familiar: launch, low adoption, blame change management, never surface that the wedge was wrong.

Field contact with CHWs, ACPs, and PCPs ran before significant build — not to defend the concept, but to locate where time, trust, and context were actually lost.

Outcomes.

Direction changed pre-build

Co-pilot abandoned; Lorena scoped upstream — voice outreach and structured handoffs before human follow-up.

Burden removal wedge

Workflow-first voice + RAG tied to real shifts — not a demo layer over chat.

Reusable infrastructure

Patterns carried across healthcare incubations at Red Cell.

What the full case covers

  • Field research process and findings that changed the roadmap
  • Interaction and voice architecture for Lorena
  • Human-in-the-loop escalation and accountability model
  • Technical architecture and incubation reuse